Talk:Retrospec
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
What concern does the editor have about advertising? They've not expressed themselves very clearly.
- Agree. If people don't like an article, they should point out exactelly what's wrong with it, or fix the damn thing themselves. This article sure could use more "meat", but given the amount of games that Retrospec has developed, IMHO it is more than notable enough to deserve an article! - Stormwatch 17:03, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
-
- It could do with rewriting since it does seem mildly like an advert at the moment in the sense that it seems to laud Retrospec. The notability thing I think is nonsense - Retrospec clearly aren't an obscure group - but there needs to be a constant vigilance on this site against editors tagging anything they (or the overly US-centric internet and therefore Google) haven't heard of as "non notable" --Zagrebo 10:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Retrospec oldskooldaze.jpg
Image:Retrospec oldskooldaze.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 04:21, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Fair use rationale added. Oenone575 (talk) 14:25, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
