Talk:Retrocausality/Comments

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Regarding my assessments

Low-importance: Part of a few viable physics concepts, such as CTCs and the modeling of antimatter as retrocausal, but hardly a topic that demands immediate attention by any means.

Start-class: I've done most of what I can ... the absorber theory stuff is a cast-off substub of a section, and I don't know where to look for more. I'm not sure how much further discussion on CTCs, Roman rings, etc. belongs here and not at their articles. Another couple sets of eyes from the Project won't hurt.

And, of course, the philosophy/social discussion section its a separate beast, although I'd like to think I've given it the same measure of attention. --Serpent's Choice 06:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)