Talk:Retracted article on toxicity of MDMA on dopamine cells
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Redwolf24 22:44, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
(William M. Connolley 08:47, 2004 May 14 (UTC)) I split this from the Science (journal) page because it was unbalanced there.
I've also edited para 1 somewhat, to point out that this is not really a peer review problem.
And I've deleted the Blakemore "quote" because as written its impossible to tell whether its a quote, paraphrase, or where Blakemores words end and the editors opinion begins.
"The Ricaurte article was not sensationalized by Science for its implications concerning any pending anti-rave legislation before Congress." This is a POV statement without any qualifications. Or was it supposed to be a quote? 80.203.115.12 13:00, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] This article needs renaming
The article refers not to the general controversy about MDMA neurotoxicity but a specific issue of "the retracted finding of dopaminergic MDMA toxicity in primates". It should be renamed. I'm not sure how one goes about doing that.
--67.101.96.107 (talk) 03:52, 16 April 2008 (UTC)