Talk:Results of the Victorian legislative election, 2006

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This subarticle is kept separate from the main article, Victorian legislative election, 2006, due to size or style considerations.

Portal	Results of the Victorian legislative election, 2006 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Can anyone explain why the person editing this page has listed the Liberal party as the first party in each block, almost as if in order of importance? Given that user Xtra is a Liberal supporter, that is hardly NPOV. 08:14, 25 November 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.64.214 (talk • contribs)

I think you read too much into things. Xtra 00:02, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Well, I'll chage it to the order as it appears on the ballot paper. Any other order is POV. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.64.214 (talk • contribs)

Tables always put the major parties first. Xtra 08:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

When we were doing South Australian legislative election, 2006 we did it the way that the results panned out. Timeshift 09:28, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The results are in now, so Labor should be on top. User Xtra's POV places Liberal and the Nationals first because he supports them. Subtle POV, but typical of his class. I will change it back now, if you don't like it, get a third opinion. 05:53, 27 November 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.87.64.214 (talk • contribs)

Please, conspiracy theories galore. Grow up. Xtra 12:09, 27 November 2006 (UTC).

Well, the order coincided with your own political preference, why would someone put Libs on top, when they haven't had state power for quite a while now, nor are they first alphabetically. Wishful thinking, I guess. By the way, you may want to have a look at weasel words and how not to use them. Thanks.02:47, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Umm, this is a pretty poor excuse for a results page if there's no percentage swing for the lower house :P Timeshift 00:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)