Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Papa Roach

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Initial details

Taken from Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Papa Roach, with modifications.

[edit] Involved parties

Also known as simply "parties" from now on.

[edit] Articles involved

[edit] Issues

  • Genre
  • Citations

[edit] Housekeeping tasks

A few things before I can begin. Could I please ask that both parties add this page to their watchlist, if they haven't done so already?

[edit] Daniel as mediator

Just to be sure that things don't fall off the rails later due to someone raising an objection to me being the mediator, either due to a prior conflict or whateverelse, can both of the parties listed please just note "Agree" or "Disagree" below.

Declining my mediation does not mean that your mediation request will be rejected. Most likely, another mediator from the Mediation Committee will be along within a month, at the most, and things will be taken from there. Cheers, Daniel 06:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

  • I agree, but the other person was blocked indef so this might be a one way conversation. Hoponpop69 03:39, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
    • They were indeed. Give that, this mediation is a little pointless as you can't mediate with yourself, so I've closed this RfM. Wow, that has to go close to being a record for quickest closed case :) Thanks for informing me, and happy editing, Daniel 04:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Location of this mediation

I've picked this talk page as a central location for the discussion. Again, just to be sure, an both of the parties listed please just note "Agree" or "Disagree" below to it being located here. If there is an issue, please briefly state why, and where you'd prefer it to be held. Cheers, Daniel 06:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)