Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/VeryVerily2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] FYI: Accuser Neutrality has injected himself deeply into controversy at John Kerry as well

I suggest that this group consider that Neutrality has enaged in activites which could imply a hidden anti-Bush agenda. If that is true, this underscores perhaps his motivations against VeryVerily. A careful examination of Neutrality's actions at the George_W._Bush talk page and history will show he had considerable conflict with VeryVerily there.

Looking at that in the light of the conflict Neutrality has been invloved with me at John Kerry, leads me to believe that there is a drive to silence certain editors which disagree with him polticially. For your information, in a current Arbitration proceeding, my chief complaints against Neutrality are: Misleading/false eEdit summaries, excessive reversions and refusal to dialog on Talk page.

Also, please take note of the Rfc [1] against the user name "Neutrality" and see that Neutrality is quick to "archive" anything which impacts him, while at the same time, has no problems with persuing others.

Rex071404 07:52, 15 Aug 2004 (UTC)