Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Lilith2396

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Comment by Idag

To clarify, Edward (User Spinoza1111) has been indefblocked for personal attacks and harassing other users.[1] Idag (talk) 23:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Attempt to Resolve Dispute

In response to Lilith pointing out my "harsh" language, I only left that comment after it became clear that Lilith was more interested in arguing and insulting other editors than contributing to Wikipedia in a constructive way. While I admit that I could have been a little nicer, there's only so many ways that you can respond to someone who calls you a "thief", "thug", "pornographer", and "convenience store clerk" (while I know many intelligent convenience store clerks, the context implies that Lilith and Edward intend for that phrase to be derogatory). Lilith clearly has no intention of doing anything constructive on Wikipedia (as evidenced by the fact that she can't even remain civil during her RfC response), so there is no point in letting her remain solely to stir up arguments and insult other users. Idag (talk) 00:29, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Endorsement

I have endorsed the summary. I have not attempted to resolve the dispute with this particular user, because I believe the account is yet another sockpuppet of Edward Nilges. Nilges has previously made it clear to me that civil discourse is impossible ([2],[3]), so I'm not going to waste my time trying. -- Coneslayer (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2008 (UTC)