Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Irismeister

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Theresa and Iris"

Shouldn't this ugly gob of data be punctuated, or something? Put another way, is there some not-very-obvious reason for it being te way it is? Arno 06:59, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)

As you might have guessed from all the + signs, this is a copy-paste from a page diff, rather than an old version of a page. It was originally moved (properly) from conflicts between users, and the person who moved it said he would put it in two places, one of which was this page. He evidently forgot to move it to this page and Irismeister decided that he was being censored, and made this not very successful copy-paste to preserve the record. I cannot remember which other page this was supposed to have been moved to, so it might be a good idea to preserve this copy.... but by all means replace it with a correctly formatted version by looking in the page history of Conflicts between users.  :) (did that convoluted explanation make sense?) fabiform | talk 07:18, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Good editing, like good heart is always rewarded ! Assume good will edit you will! Happy editing :-) - irismeister 10:34, 2004 Mar 12 (UTC)

Information about the migration of page content from Wikipedia:Conflicts between users to Wikipedia:Conflicts between users/Irismeister and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Irismeister along with the full, unedited version of the transferred information can be found on the edit at: [1] - MykReeve 11:44, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)

OK, I edited out the + and page returns. Enjoy ! - irismeister 17:42, 2004 Mar 12 (UTC)

Yes, it's a bit spacious now, but a lot more readable. Thanks. Arno 09:30, 13 Mar 2004 (UTC)

WHAT'S NEW

Irismeister has finished gathering evidence for a monstrously big case against the fascist penchant of Wikipedia against alternative medicine. I hereby publicly thank all those candid or only stupid admin/sysop/police/whatever caring to answer my deliberately provocative and elaborate evidence-gathering process. I've got you, fascists :O)

You bet you'll think twice about your career as Wikipedic "editors" after the facts are made public - Look for legal papers with your usual interest, for they are coming to all of you (you know who you are :O) any time now and soon enough for a public show about the nakedness of Wiki Staff, Emperesses and co-workers! I'm happy I could find such incredible numbers of gullible anglo-american would-be fascists! My friends now have all the data from the trusted third parties, to organize a Nuremberg-like HUGE trial based on the very evidence these wiki "editors" so eagerly supplanted. There is ugliness, censorship and deliberate disinformation in Wikipedia. Things are bad enough to warrant that serious legal consideration which I felt was needed the very moment I experienced censorship. The days of censorship and fake "ban you for personal attack" policies used as a figleaf for brutish force are over. Hang on to your mice, fellas - you'll need them sooo badly :O) Nobody hides truth indefinitely, using the pathethically, terminally diseased pharisean culture - You asked for it! You will be served with the very seed you planted, only for justice! And for those of you who wrote for the record that I "threatened" you with trials - you may breathe again! It's started! Only it's now you who will have to explain just that, for a start: Since when is rendering JUSTICE a THREAT ? May I suggest JUSTICE for dummies - an excellent reference you'll find amusing and useful in your future wiki editing careers :O) irismeister 12:23, 2004 Oct 5 (UTC)