Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Lft6771

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Clerk note: discussion added from main page. ST47 00:43, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

May I comment: 1. I am in favor of the truth and have studied the topic I am editing extensively. The changes being made and content being deleted is not correct. Just because I reject misinformation (in this case negative against an Iraqi insurgent group), does not mean I favor them. 2. The "revert 4" and "revert 5" are not reverts but adding of material and making changes to the article (i.e. contributing). 3. Speaking for the other user, they are just restoring content that was deleted. If you want to contribute go ahead, but not blank out entire sections which is considered vandalism. 4. My other edit is just that restoring of deleted content. -Lft6771 18:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

The issue here, necessarily, isn't who's correct. It's if 3RR was violated. If you are the same person as NavyFalcon, then you were using multiple accounts to edit war and violate 3RR, which is an offense capable of a 24 hour block. If not, then apologies. The Evil Spartan 00:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)