Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/GooseCreek
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Shibumi2 gets 2-week block
Do you really believe Shibumi2 will edit in a good-faith manner upon the expiration of the 2-week block? Do things usually work this way after such egregious abuse of our system? Badagnani (talk) 19:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- Aren't these usually indef? Lawrence Cohen 19:55, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- What you've probably got there is a university professor who assigned this article as some sort of class project. That would explain the shared IP address and Shibumi2's unexplained departure from his usual focus on Japanese Navy articles. Thanks for your obedience to WP:AGF and WP:BITE, by the way. Neutral Good (talk) 20:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- A Sprint mobile PCS is a shared IP? That's what they give to cell phones or mobile laptop internet. Each one is unique. Lawrence Cohen 20:59, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
"Each one is unique." What is your reliable source for that, Lawrence? Or are we supposed to just take your word for it, after your multiple, provably false accusations? And regarding your false accusation against the "209" IP editor, hasn't it already been proven that the IP address traces back to an enormous corporation with thousands of employees? Hasn't an administrator at WP:ANI pointed out that Waterboarding isn't one of the articles that BryanFromPalatine was interested in? Neutral Good (talk) 21:18, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
- In part, because I have Sprint on my own phone, and because if it was a well know heavily used IP address that hundreds or thousands of people browsed through, it would show up on Google. Most big IPs, from schools and the such, always do. And let's leave the investigation if any of the 209 address to the Checkusers who know what they are doing. Lawrence Cohen 22:23, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Length of block
(Not yet answered): Do you really believe Shibumi2 will edit in a good-faith manner upon the expiration of the 2-week block? Do things usually work this way after such egregious abuse of our system? Badagnani (talk) 00:18, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- The results here are good. Do not worry. We will be vigilant for future troublemaking and if there is a next time, the block will be much longer. Jehochman Talk 00:49, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. You have a positive attitude. Badagnani (talk) 00:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Remove posts
I have removed several off topic posts that were unrelated to the work of building an encyclopedia. If you have questions about the checkuser process, please direct them to a checkuser. Thank you. Jehochman Talk 00:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Shibumi2 has been unblocked
Just a note: Shibumi2, the Checkuser admin, unblocked Shibumi2 after less than six days of a two-week block. Lucasfbr, the admin who blocked him, left a post on Shibumi2's Talk page that says, "I'm happy to see that things were resolved, and sorry for the mess!" Neutral Good (talk) 02:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
At WP:ANI I requested clarification and received this answer:
For the record, that was forgiveness and understanding but not vindication
Diff: [1] I hope this helps. Jehochman Talk 16:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
