Wikipedia talk:Requests for checkuser/Case/Downtrip

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I feel it important to point out that Banofreep appeared only after Downtrip was blocked for repeated 3RR violations and editwarring. Banofreep has edited only the same page of contention and has made only the same removal that Downtrip does: this has lead several other editors besides myself to conclude that a conection exists between Banofreep and Downtrip hence the check user request. Downtrip himself has yet to provide any evidence to discredit Dmcdevit a skilled operator of check user so it is safe to assume that his previous incident of Sockpuppetry was indeed factual.Freepsbane (talk) 20:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Don't make me laugh Freepsbane. Your edits are pretty limited and lately you have all but disappeared except when you want to troll me. How about we play match the IPs with you. What ISP do you use? If you have nothing to hide why not tell us who. Why not do a checkuser on all the IPs and editors that have edited the Fourth Generation Page of the past week or so. Lets see who's socks are found under the bed. As for Dmcdevit and his assertion that it was LIKELY that is a far cry from confirmed and again based on his or her's reasoning it's a pretty flimsy conclusion that others should have checked and verified. At the end of it all Freepsbane, I really hope someone here does something about you because you are nothing but a troll who goes about making accusations about people that you would not dare do to their face. That fact that people like you are tolerated here is what gives Wikipedia such a bad name.--Downtrip (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


You may say such however keep in mind that I have edited constructively here for two years while you have used your accounts only for edit warring and have created sock accounts such as baneofreep to go against consensus. If you so wish you can try a check IP on your own time and go fishing for me or those who opposed you, I doubt it will do you any good though you seem to be the only sock user in the incident. If you wish to so go ahead but it will do you no more good than bringing your Banofreep account here to vouch for you. any one who looks at your contrib. history will see you have accused other veteran editors of trolling on enough incidents any such claim from you requires skepticism[1] [2]. Freepsbane (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2008 (UTC)