Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/TingMing/Evidence
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop twisting this RFCU in your own flavor. Thus far, I have not been a confirmed sock puppet of Nationalist. Do not put me on the same level as him. Do not treat me badly. I am not Nationalist, I swear. Why hasn't anyone else performed another Check user then? To Clear my NAME. By the way, Nationalist uses another Internet Service Provider than I did. It is impossible that I am Nationalist. Please check on the Check User page for Nationalist to confirm what I just said. TingMing 23:46, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's kinda funny that you copied my original message for your own use. The fact that I have said the similar to you on your stands about the RFCU result here and here is a bit too much of a coincidence. If I can still recall, Nationalist also copied Yankees76's argument that says to him "Nice strawman argument" and used it somewhere else against another person later. Vic226說 04:04, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Thredded messages by TingMing
I don't know if anyone is going to check in this talk page at all, but it appears that TingMing has no intention of reorganizing his threaded comments under our evidences into a section of his own (as evident to his next edit after my notice to him). I would say that a clerk is needed as it has been a while since Newyorkbrad's last message to him about this issue. Vic226說 16:14, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] TingMing's talkpage archive
User talk:TingMing/Archive 1. Although Ting insists that there's no need to do this and had deleted the link on his page, I feel that there might be evidences there.--Jerry 22:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
