Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Rktect/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Rktect moves

1.) That the characterization of writing as being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.

2.) That the submission of a contribution for a vfd as being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.

3.) That the soliciitation of actions by others against a contributor on grounds of "original research" and "pseudo science" after said contribution has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack

4.) That the reversion of a contribution on grounds of it being "original research" and "pseudo science" after it has been cited as taken from a source be considered a personal attack.

5.) That the repeated removal of material from Wikipedia as part of a personal attack be considered a bad faith action against the interests of Wikipedia.

6.) That false statements given to justify the removal of Wikification, content and references be considered a personal attack. Rktect 16:24, 25 September 2005 (UTC)