Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Locke Cole

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents 1 Focus of discussion 2 comments regarding myself 3 Username change 4 Mathematical expressions and conditional constructs 5 Namespaces

[edit] Focus of discussion

I am concerned that this has been opened as a request for arbitration concerning only Locke Cole. While Netoholic brought the original complaint, everyone making statements in this matter has referred to Netoholic's behavior. Is it the intention of the Arbcomm to have a separate RfC/RfAr discussing Netoholic's behavior? If not, I suggest we change the name to something a little more appropriate. ... aa:talk 12:51, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] comments regarding myself

Not only have edits on my part been brought up, but they have been characterized by Netoholic. I don't feel that (in the present scope of this discussion) I am involved. As such, I don't feel it is appropriate for me to add comments or "evidence" to this discussion. However, Netoholic will use such characterizations in the future if nobody removes them. "Well, this [http://... edit] from years ago shows you were moving articles in bad faith back then."

I think the scope of this discussion needs to be widened, or the bystanders need to be 100% removed from it. I do not need to be mentioned by name in this discussion at all, and nor do my actions need to be characterized in this discussion as I am an unrelated, uninvolved party. If that is not the case, we need to make that very clear. ... aa:talk 20:28, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

As far as I'm concerned, I don't think you are involved... but in order to prove my assertions about Locke, I have to describe the situation up to the point he became involved. I'll review my section to see if I can balance your concern in with my needs. -- Netoholic @ 20:43, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Seeing as I cannot edit your comments here, I would like it if you would take it upon yourself to edit your own comments. I think I made a good effort to make the edits I made (wrongly) to your "Evidence" section as neutral (to the conflict between you and I) as possible. Again, I'm looking to follow your lead here. Already we've had at least a couple reverts in this case, it's not looking good. Please try to take the lead here. ... aa:talk 05:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Username change

I have changed the name of my wiki account from "Adrian Buehlmann" to "Ligulem" ([1], [2]). Best regards, --Ligulem 08:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mathematical expressions and conditional constructs

Tim Starling started work to replace {{qif}} with a native mediawiki construct: [3], [4] and this. --Ligulem 11:36, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Namespaces

I just noticed something. The finding of fact says

• "However, Netoholic has indeed subsequently caused disruption in his editing in the Wikipedia and Template namespaces."

but the remedy:

• "banned from editing in the template namespace for one year"

does not include the Wikipedia namespace. Was this overlooked or was it intentional? I don't see any discussion about it either way. — Omegatron 18:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)