Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Kosovo/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Article probation

Seeing the first proposals for remedies, I again would like to promote an Article Probation for Kosovo and related articles. We have seen a lot of different editors come and go during the period of this dispute and only article probation will allow administrators to deal also with future disruptive edits by editors not involved in this particular Arbitration request.

Since this is a very heated topic, there undoubtly will be other editors (both neutral and with strong POVs) attracted to these articles. I am afraid that in some time from now the exact same situation will occur, but with a different group editors, unless something can be done to prevent that. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 09:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Well, these edits of today: [1] by 82.114.95.33 (talk · contribs) and the subsequent edit: [2] by Nikola Smolenski  (talk · contribs) show exactly (not even 2 days after the protection was lifted) that the people in this arbitration will simply be replaced by others, and therefore article probation is the only thing that will do anything good (contrary to blocking individual users) And another new editor joined in: Palmucha (talk · contribs) [3]. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 19:35, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
Palmucha and 82.114.95.33 are sockpuppets of Vezaso; Nikola has been an active editor on the article in the past. I do agree with your point, though. Vezaso had only made a handful of edits to Kosovo prior to starting the edit war on 27 August that precipitated this arbitration. The article is a magnet for POV warriors on both sides, unfortunately. -- ChrisO 13:33, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Probations

Why am I listed in the probations? I do not have a signicant number of edits and I have just attempted to enforce to what I understood to be the consensus amoung the other editors. There has been nothing discussed in the /workshop or presented in /evidence that suggests this, only the proposed finding of fact that is inaccurate -- I have not been banned for any edits relating to Kosovo.// Laughing Man 19:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comment from Hipi Zhdripi, moved from main page

[edit] Christ0

The serbians account users they can not finde the letter of strings "Serbia" in the UN resulution and in last statment of CG. They can not reader or what is hapen with they I dont know, But Chris0 and many-many account of him are playen are maken Wikipedia a serbian propaganderpage. - Hipi

Upss! I sayed serbian propagander beacose I know only one propagander based on mytologie. We have rez. 1244 and last statment there is no "SERBIA" (chek it is no SERBIA there) kapische!!!

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.208.136.241 (talk • contribs)

[edit] Frozen

Why has the Arbitration mysteriously frozan; died like the Former Yugoslav WikiProjects? --PaxEquilibrium 19:18, 12 October 2006 (UTC)