Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Dalmatia/Proposed decision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Arbitrators active on this case

Active:

  • Charles Matthews
  • FloNight
  • Fred Bauder
  • Jdforrester
  • Jpgordon
  • Kirill Lokshin
  • Matthew Brown (Morven)

Inactive/away:

  • Blnguyen
  • Flcelloguy
  • Mackensen
  • Neutrality (Ben)
  • Paul August
  • Raul654
  • SimonP
  • UninvitedCompany


[edit] Comments

I'm not DIREKTOR's advocate neither I'm trying to be, but I must point something: edit warring on Dalmatia related pages is not only question of users behaviour but also question of users honesty. Keep in mind and check it - DIREKTOR was mostly editing according to the talk page discussions, while Giove's edits were mostly irrational. Equalizing of responsibilities for edit warring of these 2 users would be superficiality. Zenanarh 18:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Comment 2

I am Italian and -of course- on the side of Giovanni Giove, but I want to express my opinion that the initial "proposed decisions" against Giovanni Giove and DIREKTOR are excessive.

Giovanni Giove has made a sustained edit-warring in "Dalmatia" (and related articles like "Zara/Zadar") because he was (practically alone) against not only DIREKTOR, but even others (Zenanarth, Kubura, No 13, etc..), so his edit-warring interventions are many more than those of anyone of them individually.

DIREKTOR has shown clever understanding of the other side's opinion (like with me) and should be rewarded for this behavior. In his help allow me to copy what has written GhePeU in the talkpage:

"......With regard to the object of this request for arbitration, until now I've always been able, in the end, to arrive to a satisfying "middle-ground" with user:DIREKTOR; however there are other users involved in this arbitration who've been prone to revert without even trying to evaluate the other's position; when someone reverts many times the same typo (a very visible "-" before a paragraph), then I think that it's impossible to discuss with them (I'm referring to User:Kubura in Italianization): they don't even read, they just look at the editor and revert to their POV. -- GhePeU 14:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)........"

Finally, I hope the arbitration will solve the problems in the articles with edit-warring, in the most friendly way possible. Regards.--Brunodam 01:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Please, use Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Dalmatia/Evidence. Kubura 12:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)