Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Nandesuka

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Comments received after close

The following comments have been removed from the nomination because they were cast after the nomination was closed with the candidate being made admin. --Tony SidawayTalk 10:12, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

  1. Support those against schoolcruft. Dunc|☺ 19:43, 16 September 2005 (UTC)
  1. Neutral -- For the most part, I like what I've seen, but would like to see more before voting "support". Give it another month or two. Tomer TALK 09:27, 19 September 2005 (UTC)


I don't see why you're doing this, Tony. People often comment after nominations have closed. It doesn't affect the vote. I suppose it must offend your sense of procedure but, really, it's not doing any harm. People are just expressing their opinion. Grace Note 10:23, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

I assume the two comment/votes were removed just as a "technical" measure... I didn't realize the RFA was closed... shouldn't there be some indication on the RFA page itself indicating that the vote is closed short of just the ending date on the RFA? something like {{vfd bottom}}? Tomer TALK 19:59, 19 September 2005 (UTC)