From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Kzrulzuall's edit stats using "wannabe Kate" tool as of 01:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC):

User:Kzrulzuall
run at Fri Apr 13 01:04:09 2007 GMT

Category talk: 1  
Category: 15  
Image talk: 3  
Image: 32  
Mainspace 2187  
Portal talk: 1  
Portal: 11  
Talk: 364  
Template talk: 2  
Template: 47  
User talk: 1870  
User: 526  
Wikipedia talk: 56  
Wikipedia: 779  
avg edits per page 1.72  
earliest 06:51, 26 October 2006  
number of unique pages 3436  
total 5894  

2006/10  45   
2006/11  89   
2006/12  124   
2007/1  345   
2007/2  1703   
2007/3  2341   
2007/4  1247   

Mainspace
162     Master of the Game
17      The Sky is Falling (novel)
17      Andy Roddick
15      Brian Caswell
14      John Grisham
13      Tennis
13      Sidney Sheldon
12      John Marsden (writer)
12      Homer Simpson
9       Master of the Game(mini-series)
9       So Much To Tell You
8       Roger Federer
7       Only the Heart
7       Burke and Wills expedition
7       Nothing Lasts Forever (1994 novel)
Talk:
10      Tennis
9       Manchester United F.C.
8       MapleStory
8       Homer Simpson
7       Kipper
5       Andy Roddick
4       3D computer graphics
3       Roger Federer
3       The Sky is Falling (novel)
2       Only the Heart
2       Sophie Masson
2       Edmund Barton
2       Capella University
2       Stefanie Sun
2       Valiathan
Category:
3       Start-Class tennis articles
3       Tennis articles with comments
2       Politicians of the Republic of China
2       Unassessed tennis articles
         
         
         
         
Image:
4       Nothing Lasts Forever (novel).jpg
3       Morning, Noon And Night.jpg
         
         
Portal:
2       Geography
2       Tennis/box-header
         
         
         
Template:
14      Importance Scheme
12      WP-Tennis
7       TENCOL
3       User WikiProject Tennis
3       Tennis topic
2       WPTennis Navbar
2       COTWs
         
         
User:
88      Kzrulzuall/UserPage
51      Kzrulzuall/monobook.js
40      Kzrulzuall
26      Kzrulzuall/VandalismLog
25      Kzrulzuall/Opening
23      Kzrulzuall/End
22      Kzrulzuall/VandalismStats
21      Kzrulzuall/sandbox
16      Kzrulzuall/Main Page
13      Kzrulzuall/Middle
10      Kzrulzuall/Talk November 2006
10      Kzrulzuall/Talk Header
6       Kzrulzuall/Awards
6       Kzrulzuall/Insults
6       Kzrulzuall/Templates/Navigation Bar
User talk:
149     Kzrulzuall
117     Sp3000
21      Jimbo Wales
19      Kuru
11      Essjay
10      Redux
9       Rajkumar Kanagasingam
8       HideandLeek
8       John Reaves
8       Trampton
7       DavidYork71
6       65.255.130.104
4       24.168.4.15
4       Arjun01
4       24.69.167.145
Wikipedia:
172     Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
121     Administrator intervention against vandalism
33      Article Creation and Improvement Drive
28      Help desk
26      WikiProject Tennis
24      Requests for page protection
17      Reference desk/Computing
15      Editor review/Kzrulzuall
13      Articles for deletion/Lunchtime soccer
12      Sandbox
12      Reference desk/Entertainment
11      WikiProject Tennis/Assessment
10      Sandbox/Storytelling
10      Suspected sock puppets/Kzrulzuall36 (2nd)
9       WikiProject Tennis/Welcome
Wikipedia talk:
22      Attack sites
16      WikiProject Tennis
8       WikiProject User scripts/Scripts/Twinkle
4       Sandbox/Storytelling
3       Version 1.0 Editorial Team

[edit] Neutral

I would oppose, but I'd rather leave this evidence here for other editors to look over, and judge for themselves. All of these excerpts were taken from his Talk Page or related, and are genuine, but do not provide the diffs. I can look through the archives again to find them if you want solid proof. I strongly suggest each editor review the following before voting. Note date and circumstances of each conversation.

KZ, Those were clearly Taiwanese Politicians and not Chinese Politicians. Big difference. Republic of China is also a name for Taiwan. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.202.97.211 (talk) 07:28, 21 March 2007 (UTC). Sorry, I confused it with the People's Republic of China. Another example of how bad my politics is...

(on User:Sp3000's talk) and im catchin up to you in edit count if you havent noticed.... --KZ 08:19, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

(on User:Sp3000's talk) Nicholas White This article is clearly a speedy delete, but the author is contesting it strongly. Need help in having this article deleted, maybe ask a admin for help? --KZ 03:31, 3 February 2007 (UTC) Keep a eye on User:Necroidmancer. He has a very funny attraction towards sd:attack. Don't piss him off or he'll go after u..!! --KZ 22:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean [2] here], is it that AN/I isn't the appropriate place to post such a notice? I thought it required attention from an Admin (and was glad that it did)... Pete.Hurd 23:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Sorry. The way you posted and stretched the words out made me think you were spamming or vandalising. You're right as it is the place to place it, although you could have tagged the article with CSD. Sorry again for the reverting of your edit. --KZ Talk • Vandal • Contrib 00:01, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

As the instructions at the top of WP:RFCN say, before listing a username for comments, please make your concern known to the user, and give him or her a chance to respond first. That may resolve the issue without anyone else getting involved. Only if that direct approach fails to settle matters, one way or the other, go to WP:RFCN and at the same time notify the user that you are doing so, giving him or her a chance to respond there as well. Otherwise it comes off as going behind the user's back, an impression I'm sure you don't want to give. The RFCN instructions list some helpful templates for these user contacts, if you're not entirely sure how to say things diplomatically. You don't have to use them, but if they even suggest ways you could phrase your own message, they've served their purpose. -- Ben TALK/HIST 15:09, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Oops.. Seem to have forgotten to do that. I actually feel asleep at my desk... Sorry about the misunderstanding of the instructions. --KZ

Please do not accuse editors of plagiarisation without good reason. See Talk:Trevor Bigham. -- Necrothesp 00:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Aladdin (List of movies sorted by uses of word fuck) You reverted my edit on what was pretty obviously vandalized before I fixed it. Even if for some reason you thought that the movie with the most fucks in it was Aladdin, you might note that every other link in the same row points to the movie in question. Mystified! 24.69.167.145 03:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I was in a rush, and seemed to have removed the comment. Accidentally wrote keep in the edit summary which made me panic. --K.Z Talk • Vandal • Contrib 06:25, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

His signature is modified in some places so as not to break template code. Statements that I think are pivotal are bolded.ALTON .ıl 20:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Okay, I'll try and reply to all of these, if possible.

1.The first one was an obvious mistake by me, which I apologized for. Despite living there for several years, I was unaware that China was called the People's Republic of China, as opposed to the Republic of China.

2. Until the middle of February, I was mainly concerned about edit count and didn't know a whole deal about Wiki-Process. I considered Wikipedia a bit of a game back then, but after a while, started regarding it as a serious project.

3. I was clearly angry, and said some very strong words that time. After Sp3000 reminded me to keep cool, I basically thought about what I did. As I said before, I wasn't very experienced at that time, but it is no excuse for my behavior.

4. It definitely looked like a advertisement for an company... He said this. [1]

5. From that point forward, I reminded myself to read the instructions first...

6. Actually I think I found the same article on a mirror of Wikipedia, which shows it was an exact replica of the article. That was before I knew it was an mirror, obviously...

7. Oh that incident was very weird... Somehow, since Lupin's tool gives you the change + one line of text, I saw The Lion King straight after that... It was obviously two vandalism edits, but I wasn't sure if it was vandalism... I've heard there are adult remakes of those cartoon movies...

8. I basically clicked the edit button, accidentally put keep in the edit summary, went back and changed it, then clicked edit again. It accidentally wiped out an edit in the process though... --KZ^{Talk• Contribs} 22:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd like to also point out the RFCU case - I stated that Kz has a competitive nature and especially against me. That was the reason why he started Wikipedia. However, I think he started to learn over time that editing Wikipedia might be a good thing after all. --The preceding comment was signed by User:Sp3000 (talk•contribs) 22:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. ALTON .ıl 22:37, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] =Moved from nomination page

Moved from my vote on the nomination page. KazakhPol 22:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

1. Me and other editors have given you suitable warnings on not making those remarks on the talk page. Since you intended to pursue this issue, I gave you a warning based on your disruptive and hurtful comments in that article talk. As for the other matters, I've apologized for the comments, so you can hardly judge me for an apologetic remark. --KZ^{Talk• Contribs} 07:04, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

   You mean "other editors and I" and apologizing for being disruptive hardly rectifies your actions. KazakhPol 07:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

   I never said that it rectifies my actions, but just want to point out that my apology shouldn't be used as evidence of my "disruptive" behavior. --KZ^{Talk• Contribs} 07:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

   KazahkPol, your pedantry is a sure sign that you've realized you have no valid points and your argument holds no merit. John Reaves (talk) 07:24, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

   The diffs speak for themselves. I suggest he retracts his nomination. KazakhPol 07:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

   This oppose borders on WP:POINT. KazahkPol, your warnings were completely valid. If you're going to oppose, oppose for a real reason, not because you are upset you were caught violating policy. ⇒ SWATJester ^{On Belay!} 00:46, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

• Swatjester, you were not involved in the dispute and are hardly in a position to be declaring votes "WP:POINT" given the uncivility of your support vote. KazakhPol 22:27, 14 April 2007 (UTC)