Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/March 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] March 1

[edit] Bpeps

Useful editor, been active for around two months, active on general cleanup and RC BpEps - t@lk 18:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Note: See yesterday's declined request at Wikipedia:Requests_for_rollback/Denied/February 2008#February 29. Sandstein (talk) 18:36, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Bpeps, please refrain from requesting rollback. Try and prove us and wrong and focus on good reverts, and encyclopedia building before asking. Rudget. 18:38, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
ok request rescinded by editor. It was worth a try. BpEps - t@lk 18:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
N Not done Acalamari 18:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 3

[edit] Bindaas19

i need rollback feature bcoz to prevent vandalism made by anon users.(specially south indian films,actors,actress related articles)
N Not done. I do not currently have confidence in your ability to handle a volatile—and potentially damaging tool—such as the rollback feature: edits such as this show a lack of basic understanding of the concepts and basic workings of vandalism reverting, which does not bode well for any logical forecasts on contributions with rollback enabled. I suggest you review Wikipedia's material on the basic concepts, such as Help:Reverting and Help:Reverting#Undo, and get some solid counter vandalism contributions under your belt, before setting about re-requesting rollback. Kind regards, AGK (contact) 17:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 9

[edit] Styrofoam1994

I know that once, in the beginning of February, my rollback rights were revoked for abuse of privileges. I have since tried to reform, and I believe I have done so successfully (see my contributions). If you look at my recent contributions from after my rollback rights were revoked, I used Twinkle to revert vandalism along with Special:Recentchanges. However, one inconvenient thing about Twinkle is that instead of going straight to the history section of an article to revert something, I have to click on the diff of a specific edit, then rollback. I would like it if this uncomfortable setting was eliminated again. I honestly will not abuse this right anymore, if I get rollback back. STYROFOAM1994Don't age bias me! 17:06, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
N Not done. Unfortunately, I am not yet confident enough that you may be granted access to a tool with as large a potential for disruption as rollback. I recognise that you have made progress since your recent block for edit warring, personal attacks, etc..., but the shadow of your edits at that time still, regretfully, hangs over. I would encourage you, absent any dip in your current progress, to re-request at a later time. AGK (contact) 17:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Carerra

I would like Rollback becuase I edit on a dial-up connection. It's really slow and this would help me revert vandalism faster Carerracarerra 15:05, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
N Not done. You have recently been issued a final warning for personal attacks, and you seem to make no counter-vandalism contributions, which strikes me as odd, considering your desire to use rollback to speed up your reverts (in that, you have very little already). Perhaps in the future, when you have more experience with vandalism reversions. AGK (contact) 17:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 17

[edit] Isabel de pablo

I wish to reinstate my page Stars Methodology and welcome comments or help on how to improve and or resolve any disputes raised about this page --Isabel de pablo (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC) Isabel de pablo (talk) 18:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
N Not done I'm afraid you don't have enough edits or experience to be entrusted with rollback. You also seem to have misunderstood the nature of the rollback tool as it won't help you achieve this. Hut 8.5 18:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 24

[edit] irn

I'm currently undoing a lot of vandalism at Khoury, and it would be a lot easier with rollback; I'm also building up my watchlist and finding myself undoing more and more vandalism. -- Irn (talk) 03:37, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
N Not done on the basis that you were blocked today for edit warring. Acalamari 19:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 25

[edit] Zahakiel

I regularly edit a number of very highly vandalized pages such as List of demons and Angel; while this rarely leads to edit wars (the vandalism is generally due to SPAs and anon. IPs, I think it would save time with these repetitive tasks. ◄Zahakiel► 02:41, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Request for Rollback

Obaidz96 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I am requesting rollback, please? I am always looking at articles, and if I see something that doesn't seem right, I look at the source, and look it up on the internet for verification. I am a very unbiased person [1]. I won't say something is vandalism if it doesn't agree with me. I will always get my facts straight. So please consider giving me Rollback!! :) --Obaidz96 (talk) 03:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

N Not done: a) Not the proper way to request (read the page carefully), long history of disruptive edits. Poeloq (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 30

[edit] Limaye

Having rollback would help me edit more efficiently. Limaye (talk) 00:39, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
N Not done. You've not been with us, and have not edited sufficiently (edit count reads 50 at the time of processing) for me to fully evaluate your suitability for rollback. Please consider installing twinkle, or simply getting more experience with the project, before re-requesting. Kind regards, Anthøny 00:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] March 31

[edit] WilliamMThompson

I try to revert vandalism as much as I can, but I can never do it fast enough, these tools would help. Doctor Will Thompson (talk) 08:43, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
N Not done due to recent block for sockpuppetry and[2]. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 14:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)