Wikipedia:Requests for rollback/Denied/February 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] February 1

[edit] User:Durzatwink

Greetings, I would like to request for rollback in order for me to work faster and more efficiently at reverting vandalism, Best regards,,--DurzaTwinkTALK (talk) 20:48, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
N Not done You have made only a single one reversion using undo or a script based tool. Please demonstrate some active vandalism reversion and then feel free to re-apply. Pedro :  Chat  20:54, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 5

[edit] Ana Nim

Monitors numerous pages that are frequent targets of vandalism; has verifiable track record of protecting articles and judicious use of "undo" button--Ana Nim (talk) 22:48, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
    • N Not done It seems like you've gotten into a recent edit war. Second opinions? Keilana|Parlez ici 22:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
      • Agree. Long term account but with very low edit levels. In addition how this user has a record of "protecting articles" mystifies me a bit. No prejudice to re-application in the future. Pedro :  Chat  22:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
        • I respect your decision but want to point out two things. First, there was no "edit war" despite the characterization of one user. It was a legitimate disagreement over a fact that, in retrospect, should have been resolved on the talk page, and which I mistook for potential vandalism. It was resolved quickly and without acrimony. I am still learning protocol and the way things work around here. Second, I do indeed daily review changes to a watchlist that includes dozens of pages, some of which are targets of frequent vandalism. If you go through my contribs list you will see numerous "rv vandalism" or "rvv" entries, though sometimes others beat me to it on the pages I watch. I have only asked for the rollback privilege to make it easier to revert some vandalism which spans multiple revisions and is sometimes interlaced with valid changes. Thanks for your consideration.

[edit] February 8

[edit] User:OttoMäkelä

for speedy reverting of vandalism
N Not done Under 250 edits and you do not appear to have ever used other tools (such as undo) in the past to revert vandalism. Sorry, no prejudice to reapplication after demonstrating need/ability to use the undo feature. Pedro :  Chat  11:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 14

[edit] Dendodge

I would like rollback to help me fight vandalism, I often click 'Random Page' to find vandalism and I am already a member of the Counter-Vandalism Unit. Thanks, George D. Watson (Dendodge).TalkHelp and assistance 19:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
N Not done, your article contributions show little evidence of vandal-fighting. Practice vandal-fighting with the undo feature for a week or two first, and come back then. Thanks! Acalamari 20:03, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
(ec'd not done so added as additional rationale) Your edits seem to be almost entirely welcome templates. I'd prefer some evidence of RC patrol or CVU input using the "undo" tool first. Welcome to reapply in a couple of weeks, of course. Pedro :  Chat  20:04, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] MC RIDE

I am requesting rollback to assist with vandals on the wwe pay per views. MC RIDE (talk) 05:06, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
N Not done, your article contributions show little demonstration of vandalism-reversion. Practice reverting vandalism with the undo feature for a week or two first, and come back then. Thanks. Acalamari 23:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 16

[edit] Barkjon

I would like to have the rollback feature to rollback vandals and other things. I know how to use the rollback feature and will not do anything Wikipedia disapproves of with it.-- Barkjon  01:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
N Not done no vandal fighting experience.   jj137 (talk) 02:20, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Solid Reign

To undo vandalism, mostly on Mexico related articles, where vandalism usually stays for a long time. Solid Reign (talk) 16:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
N Not done, you have very little experience and comparatively few of your edits are vandalism reverts. The undo function should be sufficient for you. Stifle (talk) 16:54, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 19

[edit] AdamD123

Would like to help Wikipedia with vandalism issues
N Not done: Get some experience with the Undo button or Twinkle first.   jj137 (talk) 23:56, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Compwhizii

I know I got this revoked last time I was granted this. I'm sorry now and will use it carefully as I now know its capabilities and powers. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 02:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
I like your progress, however, I'm disinclined to +rollbacker, the removal of which having occured so recently. However, I'm not tagging it as yet. Justin(Gmail?)(u) 03:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Well, one thing that admins don't have to guess is how you will use the rollback. Give yourself a little bit more time and use Twinkle for now. OhanaUnitedTalk page 03:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Okay then. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 03:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
N Not done. Thanks for being cool about this. Tagged for bot archiving purposes. Justin(Gmail?)(u) 03:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 29

[edit] Bpeps

It seems like a very elite club and I've done good recently, there was a brief period of alledged wikistalking but it was all down to Dipsomania is gone now really BpEps - t@lk 12:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
It's not an elite club, it means nothing. Do you understand that? John Reaves 13:00, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
yep, I do but either give it to everybody or none at all surely? My comments on the original "vote" Anyway, Ive done good now, give me candy. BpEps - t@lk 13:18, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
N Not done You seem to think this is a treat, not the innocuous tool it should be. John Reaves 13:23, 29 February 2008 (UTC)