This case was closed at 06:53, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
The reason given for closure was: Inactivity.
Parties: If you wish to resume this mediation, please file a new request.
Should the following text be added to the lead and does it comply with WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY? Is it WP:NPOV?
The term white people does not refer perceived color of skin per se[1]; the people described can be pinkish,[2] reddish,[citation needed] white, tan or golden brown[3] in skin color, extending the perception of white skin to a much broader set of people. In this term, white functions as a color metaphor for race,[4] one that emerged from a racialized, European historical context.[5]
Should a modified version of the text replace it, if it does not remain?
Is the following text a NPOV statement? Does it comply with WP:NOR and WP:VERIFY:
The population of people classified as white has a predominant European ancestry, along with substantial ancestry from other continents. Both maternal and paternal lines among white people trace to European as well as non-European lines.
All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.