Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/The Hunger Project
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This case was closed at 06:21, 8 July 2006 (UTC) |
Contents |
[edit] The Hunger Project
[edit] Involved parties
- Jcoonrod (talk · contribs)
- Smeelgova (talk · contribs)
- Descendall (talk · contribs)
- Enkido (talk · contribs)
- Pedant17 (talk · contribs)
Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request: Provide diffs showing where {{RFMF}} was added to the talk page(s) of the involved article(s), and {{RFM-Request}} was placed on the talk pages of the other parties.
- Article talk pages:
- User talk pages:
- User talk:Jcoonrod
- User talk:Smeelgova
- User talk:Descendall
- User talk:Enkido
- User talk:Pedant17
[edit] Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:
- Discussion at The Hunger Project
- Discussion at Joan Holmes
- Request for arbitration filed on 23 June 2006
[edit] Issues to be mediated
- Structure for the article that is not inherently biased or misleading
- Equal balance of positive and negative perspectives
- NPOV content in presentation of criticism, and negative/positive commentary
[edit] Additional issues to be mediated
- Determination of what constitutes relevant links
- Allowance for equally weighted positive/negatively balanced links
[edit] Parties' agreement to mediate
- All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
- Agree. Descendall 01:49, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Smeelgova 02:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. Jcoonrod 07:48, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree - Pedant17 00:35, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Agree. --Enkido 17:47, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Please note: "Agree" or "disagree" only in this section. If there are issues that need to be raised, like inclusion or exclusion of parties, please ask on the talk page. Essjay (Talk • Connect) 22:54, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Decision of the Mediation Committee
- Accept.