Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Shatt al-Arab (Arvand Rud)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Shatt al-Arab (Arvand Rud)


This Request for Mediation has been closed.

This case was closed at 06:26, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
The reason given for closure was: Parties no longer agree to mediation.
Parties: If you wish to resume this mediation, please file a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 14:31, May 14, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Involved parties

  1. Ahwaz (talk · contribs) — Email received
  2. Alborz Fallah (talk · contribs) — Email received
  3. AlexanderPar (talk · contribs)
  4. Arash the Archer (talk · contribs) — Email received
  5. Askari Mark (talk · contribs) — Email received
  6. Ev (talk · contribs) — Email received
  7. Gerash77 (talk · contribs) — Email received
  8. Mardavich (talk · contribs)
  9. Pejman47 (talk · contribs) — Email received
  10. Pmanderson (talk · contribs) — Email received
  11. Rklawton (talk · contribs) — Email received
  12. Tariqabjotu (talk · contribs) — Email received
  13. UTAFA (talk · contribs) — Email received
When I received email from everyone regarding this, I'll create the accounts and send you the passwords via email. Daniel 06:52, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
As AlexanderPar hasn't got an email address activated and hasn't been active on-Wikipedia for a week now, and Mardavich has taken a Wikibreak, I believe we're ready to start. AlexanderPar, if/when you become active, please email me so I can get you an account (see the bottom of this page for instructions). Mardavich, when you feel comfortable returning, please feel free to do the same thing, in your own time. However, as to not place any unneeded pressure, we will begin now. You should all recieve emails within the next 30mins with your username, password and a link to the Private Wiki. Cheers, Daniel 08:39, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Articles involved

[edit] Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

[edit] Issues to be mediated

  • The name for the article

[edit] Additional issues to be mediated

  • (none so far)

[edit] Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed.
  1. Agree. -- tariqabjotu 14:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  2. Agree. -- Rklawton 15:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  3. Agree. --الأهواز | Hamid | Ahwaz 15:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  4. Agree. -- Askari Mark (Talk) 17:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  5. Agree. -- Ev 20:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  6. Agree. -- Septentrionalis PMAnderson 23:48, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  7. Agree. -- UTAFA 02:48, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  8. Agree.--Pejman47 20:09, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  9. Agree.-- Arash the Archer 21:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
  10. Agree--Alborz Fallah 12:05, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
  11. Agree--Mardavich 08:32, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  12. Agree--Gerash77 16:11, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
  13. Agree--AlexanderPar 22:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Decision of the Mediation Committee

Accepted
For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[omg plz] 20:22, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
I've got this one, for the Committee.
To the involved parties: I strongly recommend private mediation for this RfM. To request an account on the private Mediation Wiki, please click this email link. Include "Shatt al-Arab (Arvand Rud)" somewhere in the subject, e.g. "Private wiki account request for Shatt al-Arab (Arvand Rud)", and I'll email you back with your account details on MedComWiki. If you do not have email enabled on your account and are unable to use the email link, please let me know on my talk page and I'll arrange to get you your MedComWiki account details to you another way. If private mediation is unacceptable to you for some reason, please let me know either via email or on my talk. Please also read the Mediation Committee policy on confidentiality.
For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 05:17, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
Unfortunately, two parties have privately withdrawn their assent to this mediation. My apologies to all involved, however both this and the inactivity of at least three other people makes this mediation unworkable. My apologies to all, however given mediation's policy and practice about being a voluntary agreement by all (hence why we reject cases that one party does not agree to), I am being forced to close this RfM. I can only suggest another request for comment, really. Daniel 06:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)