Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/RAW (rolling paper)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] RAW (rolling paper)


This Request for Mediation has been closed.

This case was closed at 21:46, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
The reason given for closure was: Party has withdrawn intent to be a party to mediation
Parties: If you wish to resume this mediation, please file a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 16:08, October 14, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Involved parties

[edit] Articles involved

[edit] Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted

[edit] Issues to be mediated

The party filing this request uses this section to list the issues for mediation. Other parties can list additional issues in the section below.
  • NPOV, conflicts of interest
  • Personal attacks

[edit] Additional issues to be mediated

Other parties can use this section to list any others issues they wish to include in the mediation. Please do not modify or remove any other party's listing. Please sign all additions to this section if there is more than two parties involved in this case.
  • The claim that RAW Rolling Papers are the healthiest to smoke, should be removed from the article. Source is not credible, as other users than myself have also pointed out. [1] [2] [3] Onyx86 03:25, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Additional issue 2

[edit] Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only "agree" or "disagree" and signatures should appear here; any comments will be removed. Comments can be made at the talk page.

#Agree. --Mrtobacco 16:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

  1. Agree.Onyx86 17:16, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. Disagree, can't mediate with a sock puppet--It's just a plant 16:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Parties' agreement to Mercury's offer

Mercury (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights), an administrator, has offered to take this case for the Mediation Committee. However, as Mercury is not a member of the Committee, it is a generally accepted practice that the parties must consent to a non-Committee member mediating a RfM.

As such, can I ask that all parties to the mediation please list whether they "agree" or "disagree" to Mercury mediating below, in much the same format as the initial agreement above.

Please note that if consent isn't given by all parties above within seven days, then you will have to wait for a Committee mediator to accept this case. On all accounts, I encourage you to take Mercury's offer, however the choice is, of course, yours.

For the Mediation Committee,
  1. Agree. Onyx86 11:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC) 11:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
  2. Agree. --Mrtobacco 21:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
  1. Disagree - can't mediate between me and a sock puppet, I've given up so please close this mediation. --Mrtobacco 16:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm ready. I've put some notes on the discussion page of this page. Regards, Mercury 17:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Decision of the Mediation Committee

A member of the Mediation Committee will indicate acceptance/rejection/other relevant notes in this section. Non-Committee members should not edit this section.
On hold pending private discussion with Committee.
For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 07:16, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Accept.
For the Mediation Committee, Daniel 02:44, 19 October 2007 (UTC)