Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Flashplayer/UGOPlayer Encyclopedic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Flashplayer/UGOPlayer Encyclopedic

[edit] Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request:

Article talk pages:
Can be viewed in the talk page, at the bottom, that both parties are awair

[edit] Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

[edit] Issues to be mediated

  • Whether the content of the article, specifically the "The Site" section is neutral or verified.
  • Whether the content of the article, specifically the "The Forum" section, and even more specifically the history section is notable.


[edit] Additional issues to be mediated

  • Whether the content of the article, specifically the "Content" section is encyclopedic and notable.
  • Whether the content of the article, specifically the "The Forum" section and its history section is notable.
  • Whether a "Top 10" list of animations and/or authors is notable for its own sake.
  • Whether a poll conducted on a website is a proper source for an article on that website.


[edit] Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected.
  • Agree. Sbloemeke 19:21, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree. Fagstein 20:11, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept: I have a small concern that the parties may be expecting more from mediation than we can offer; the issues are phrased in a way that suggests they are looking for a binding decision from someone else. Mediators don't make such decisions; we help parties come to an agreement about such questions. As long as the parties are aware that the mediator will not be issuing a judgment, we should be fine.
For the Mediation Committee, Essjay Talk • Contact 05:44, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: Sbloemeke hasn't edited besides the two day interval on February 20 and 21. Is this mediation still necessary? Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I agree with Flcelloguy; mediation is closed, but may be reopened at the parties' request. Essjay Talk • Contact 10:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)