Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Ascended master

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Ascended master


This Request for Mediation has been closed.

This case was closed at 00:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
The reason given for closure was: Inactivity
Parties: If you wish to resume this mediation, please file a new request.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 18:24, October 30, 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Involved parties

[edit] Articles involved

[edit] Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

  • WP:RFC I didn't notice this one on the list, however, the editor in question seems to be little interested in discussion. Page did go through RFC: [1]. My bad. Thanks Hele!
  • WP:AN/I Is ANI the right place for content disputes? 3RR incident leading to 12 hour block

[edit] Issues to be mediated

  • Should the NPOV tag be present on the article?
  • Are the opposing links appropriate for inclusion?

[edit] Additional issues to be mediated

( N / A )

[edit] Parties' agreement to mediate

All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
  • Agree - Richfife 18:25, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree - Aburesz 22:16, 8 November 2006
  • Agree. Quendus 19:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree --Vindheim 20:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Agree Hele 7 12:55, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Decision of the Mediation Committee

  • Accept
For the Mediation Committee, ^demon[yell at me] 01:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I will mediate this, assuming User:Aburesz is willing to join. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:46, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Now that everyone has agreed to the mediation, please indicate whether you would prefer public or private mediation. Thanks! --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 13:34, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I am not very familiar with the procedure, so I browsed around and found that "The mediation process is private and the mediator and disputants are expected to keep the process confidential." [2]. See also [3]. Please correct me if this is not true. Hele 7 09:17, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

If you would like it to be private it is private. However some prefer it to be public therefore I gave that option. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 13:24, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I have agreed to Mediation, and welcome this opportunity to restore a neutral, academic and informative atmosphere to the article page on the topic of "Ascended Masters" - which is NOT unique to any one person or religious organization. Aburesz 16:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

This case is now being mediated by email. --PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 23:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Is this mediation still ongoing?

The notice has been re-inserted on Talk:Ascended_master that this mediation is still ongoing! Is it? If so, what is going on? Aburesz 17:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)