Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Politics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
- Talk:United States presidential election, 2008 Disagreement over whether infobox should be included, and if so, who should be included
- Talk:Anti-Americanism Disagreement over whether part of this article is plagiarized
- Talk:North-West Frontier Province Is the photograph in the "History" section relevant to the article?
- Talk:Islamic terrorism Dispute over whether facial mutiliation should be incuded in article on Islamic Terrorism
- Category talk:Terrorism Is the criteria for this article NPOV and verifiable, or does it open Wikipedia to charges of libel?
- Wikipedia talk:Fringe theories It seems to me that the section in question was inserted and is being kept against the general consensus, and that consensus should exist before major changes are made to this guideline
- Talk:Celebrations of the September 11, 2001 attacks should this article be merged into Reactions to the September 11, 2001 attacks#Islamic world
- Talk:Great power Russia is starting to be listed at as a current superpower, USA listed as a former superpower, 2 regional powers listed as different levels of almost being a great power
- Talk:Current political events of Venezuela Is this article worthy of being in Wikipedia or should something else be done? Please see talk page for further thoughts
- Talk:Superpower This is a dispute regarding the superpower status of Russia
- Talk:Potential superpowers/Archive 1 This is a dispute regarding the superpower status of Russia
- Talk:Anti-Americanism/Archive 26 Should this section be shortened or deleted? Note that this article is 35k of readable prose; Wikipedia recommends 30k to 50k as a maximum
- Talk:Jihad Watch Is the category "Anti-Islam sentiment" appropriate for the article? Would an alternative category suffice? What standards should be used to judge if the article belongs in a category?
- Talk:Barack Obama/Archive 20 This RfC is about whether it is tendentious to remove a statement about university professor Bill Ayers' former violent militancy, along with a footnote to the NYT piece about his memoirs, and replace it with a statement that he was a former radical activist.
- Talk:Xinhua News Agency Is reporters without borders a reliable source to cite for criticism of Xinhua being a propaganda agency?
- Talk:International reaction to Fitna One user hates flags; another thinks their use is justified.
- Talk:Eco-terrorism Do the comments reported in sources 11 and 12 constitute an allegation that Greenpeace is ecoterrorist?
- Talk:The Bell Curve Inclusion of author's response to investigative report
To add a discussion to RFC:
- Add {{RFCpol| section=section name !! reason=a short summary of the discussion !! time= ~~~~~ }}
- Mind the exclamation marks! Do not use pipe symbols to separate the parameters.
- Warning:
!and=will not work anywhere in the template, except for parameter separation.{{and}}might work outside of the time parameter.|works again. - Do not edit the RFC list directly; the bot will invariably undo your edits.
- Report problems to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comments.
