Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Bushit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute, not different disputes. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 19:55, 12 Jul 2004), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 14:21, 13 June 2008 (UTC).

Contents

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct.

  • Description:
Offensive username. Vandalized George W. Bush. Added nonsense commentary to Silvio Berlusconi.
  • Evidence of disputed behavior (provide diffs and links):
  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  • Applicable policies:
  1. Wikipedia:No offensive usernames
  • Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute (provide diffs and links):
  1. [3]
  2. [4] - Created nonsense article (American NPOV).
  1. [5] - Responded that he was trying to make a joke when creating American NPOV.
  • Users certifying the basis for this dispute (sign with ~~~~):
  1. VV[[]] 19:55, 12 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  2. Neutrality 01:52, 15 Jul 2004 (UTC)
  • Other users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):
  1. Not only is that username offensive, but that joke is so tired. - DropDeadGorgias (talk) 16:58, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)
  2. He is active again and has engaged into some fresh vandalism. Andris 23:22, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)
  • Addendum:
  1. This user appears to be inactive of this writing. VV 05:16, 5 Aug 2004 (UTC)
    • He is active again and vandalized George W. Bush a few minutes ago. Andris 23:21, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to a vote or endorsement, should be directed to this page's discussion page.