Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Arbiteroftruth
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 18:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 07:28, 9 June 2008 (UTC).
- Arbiteroftruth (talk • contribs • logs)
Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.
Contents |
[edit] Statement of the dispute
This is not so much of a dispute, but rather, a desire on my part to hear what other editors have to say about certain aspects of my conducts here on Wikipedia, and how I should go on to rectify these problems. I have decided to start this RFC on myself due to a message I recently received from another editor who did not like how I acted against a disruptive editor.
[edit] Desired outcome
The desired outcome for this RFC is for me to see what other users think of my actions and conducts on Wikipedia, and correct and mitigate any negative aspects in those aforementioned areas.
[edit] Description
Throughout most of my time on Wikipedia, I have a "zero-tolerance" policy against vandals, and this, I believe, has gotten me to a point where I have ignored the AGF and the Civility rules. A good example would be at a time when I get into content disputes with other editors who attempted to put in extremely POV materials in an article, I took a hardline stance against the user that, in hindsight, was not too friendly.
[edit] Evidence of disputed behavior
Not Applicable in this case
[edit] Applicable policies and guidelines
{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
-
- WP:CIVIL
- WP:AGF
[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
Not Applicable in this case
[edit] Other users who endorse this summary
[edit] Response
This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary:
[edit] Outside view
This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary:
[edit] Discussion
All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.
