Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Alastor Moody

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 20:00, 16 September 2006 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 19:43, 11 June 2008 (UTC).

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Contents

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

[edit] Description

User has a history of useless and/or irrelevant edits to talk pages (particularly on WikiProject Tropical cyclones), in violation of WP:NOT (a chat room). The user also has an extremely long signature that violates WP:SIG, and asking him civilly to shorten his sig results in backlash. This editor also has a history of ignoring warnings, as shown below in the evidence section.

[edit] Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

  1. Ignoring warnings, violating WP:NOT: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6],[7]
  2. Personal attacks: [8],
  3. Borderline invicility/attacks: [9]
  4. Rampant editcountitis: [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], etc

[edit] Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

  1. WP:NOT (a chat room, a discussion forum, etc.)
  2. WP:NPA
  3. WP:SIG
  4. WP:CIV

[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

  1. Asking him to use, then shorten his sig: [15], [16], [17]
  2. Warning of violation of WP:NOT: [18]

[edit] Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

  1. Coredesat talk! 20:37, 16 September 2006 (UTC) Certification withdrawn, the conduct issues have not recurred. --Coredesat (talk) 00:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
  2. Hello32020 20:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  3. Nilfanion (talk) 20:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  4. Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 21:36, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
  5. – Chacor 01:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other users who endorse this summary

  1. I've known Alastor Moody for the whole time he's been at Wikipedia (including back when he was known as User:Mr. Parks), and I can attest this summary is correct. The majority of Alastor's edits were reverted, ignored, or responded unfavorably. Of his 13 uploaded images, only one links to an actual article, and that one doesn't even have proper copyright status. In addition, he considered comments from another user as hate mail, and generally makes inappropriate and juvenile comments on talk pages, and these are only in the last 11 days. Hurricanehink (talk) 22:16, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}


Users who endorse this summary:

[edit] Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page. 20:00, 16 September 2006 (UTC)