Wikipedia:Requests for comment/80.217.152.161

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

80.217.152.161 (talk · contribs) et al.

The current date and time is: 16:55, 2 December 2005 (UTC).

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This is a summary written by users who dispute this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

[edit] Description

On November 20, this anonymous user began adding material to Darod (diff.) and Hawiye (diff.). User began including statements regarding relative sizes (i.e. populations) of the two clans, as well as asserting one clan's political and economic dominance. I began searching for references which might at least settle the issue of clan size. I was unable to turn up any actual numbers, and the references that I did find gave conflicting data. I figured it was best to make note of that discrepancy and cite both of the references. Since then, the anonymous user has been deleting one of the citationss, and/or re-wording the other, to assert his own claims regarding the clans' relative sizes.

Also, the Darod article indicated that an ancestor had migrated to the area in 1200 CE, and cited a source for this information. The anonymous user kept changing this to 1800 (and, at one point, 1700) without citing a reference.

In addition to replacing information that cites its sources with information that does not, the user has removed existing formatting and wiki links, and introduced numerous grammatical and syntactical errors.

I left a note on the user's talk page requesting that he cite sources for his assertions and, furthermore, to not attribute his modified statements to the existing references. This was among some other comments that CambridgeBayWeather and myself had left. The user never responded on his talk page, nor on the articles' talk pages. Unsure of what to try next, on November 26 I requested that the two articles be protected (fearing that this had already devolved into a revert war) [1]. Rather than protecting the articles, Dmcdevit blocked the anonymous user for 24 hours for violating WP:3RR [2]. Following the block, the user continued making similar reverts on November 29, and again exceeded three reversions, resulting in a 48 hour block. I suspect that the user has evaded this block using IP address 193.13.57.225 (both addresses are based in Sweden).

-- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:42, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

A sampling of edits in which reversions occurred:

Darod article:

03:46, 20 November 2005 (first such edit to this article by this user)
08:58, 20 November 2005
06:00, 22 November 2005
15:51, 22 November 2005
23:43, 22 November 2005
21:33, 24 November 2005
18:21, 26 November 2005
02:16, 29 November 2005
23:25, 29 November 2005

Hawiye article:

07:07, 20 November 2005 (first such edit to this article by this user)
08:35, 20 November 2005
05:50, 22 November 2005
22:06, 22 November 2005
13:13, 23 November 2005
12:17, 25 November 2005
13:59, 26 November 2005
18:11, 26 November 2005
23:28, 29 November 2005

Possibly evading Nov. 29 IP block:

[edit] Applicable policies

WP:3RR

[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

User talk:80.217.152.161#Hawiye & Darod (no response)
Talk:Darod (no response)
Talk:Hawiye (no response)
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Darod & Hawiye
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR#User:80.217.152.161 (possibly evaded block)
User talk:193.13.57.225

[edit] Users certifying the basis for this dispute

(sign with ~~~~)

Gyrofrog (talk) 16:55, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 16:49, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Other users who endorse this summary

(sign with ~~~~)

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary (sign with ~~~~):

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.