Wikipedia:Requests for comment/77.128.196.58

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 08:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 22:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC).

77.128.196.58 (talk • contribs • logs)

Also known as:

77.128.196.58 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)

77.132.207.111 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)

77.132.223.232 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)

77.132.240.19 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)

77.132.233.129 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)

77.132.225.207 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)

77.132.189.159 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • trace • RBLs • http • block user • block log)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

1 Statement of the dispute
2 Response
3 Outside view
4 Discussion

[edit] Statement of the dispute

This range of IPs (77.128.*.* and 77.132.*.*) has been heavily involved with Results of the 2008 Democratic Party presidential primaries and Results of the 2008 Republican Party presidential primaries. Specifically, this user keeps changing the "Actual pledged delegates" row in the "Overview of results" table to a running tally of the past seven days' results. There have been many attempts to reach out to this user and have them contribute constructively to the discussion, but they have all failed and the editor continues to ignore discussion on the talk page. I believe part of the problem may stem from the editor not understanding the meaning of the word "actual" in this context (it has nothing to do with a time period).

[edit] Desired outcome

All editors involved follow the consensus achieved on the talk page of the articles in question.

[edit] Description

The editor in question refuses to listen to other editors.

[edit] Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

[edit] Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

[edit] Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

[edit] Users certifying the basis for this dispute

~ Paul^T+/_C 08:43, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Data Fever (talk) 08:50, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Bryan H Bell (talk) 08:58, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Wdfarmer (talk) 11:21, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Other users who endorse this summary

[edit] Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

[edit] Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

[edit] Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.