Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Vritti
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Vritti
| main edit links history watch Filed: 09:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC) |
- Vritti (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Watchtower Sentinel (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) --> currently being investigated on WP:SSP (see below for diff)
Already established as sockpuppets/puppeteers and blocked or banned:
- NoToFrauds (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
--> banned for disruptive editing - Terminator III (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
--> sockpuppet along with the following 4 on this list - Juan dela Cruz (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Hamsacharya duh (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Senior Hamsacharya (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Akal Purakh (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: A
User is very new and suspiciously in cahoots with Watchtower Sentinel (talk · contribs), another brand new editor (who is being investigated for sockpuppet abuse), about a COI case. Looks too coincidental. See: [1], [2]. I think checking against Watchtower Sentinel or the two IPs should be sufficient to establish RFCU, but I added the other ones just in case he's being sneaky. --Hamsacharya dan 09:46, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Declined "A" requests go in the IP check section and require an explanation of why a block is otherwise insufficient. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 18:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
