Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VartanM
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] VartanM
main edit links history watch talk Filed: 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC) |
- VartanM (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Hetoum I (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- TheTruth4578 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Hakob (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Clerk note: these 9 accounts were added by the accused, VartanM. --ST47Talk 23:33, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- DrAlban (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Zhirtibay (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Otvetniyudar (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Aramgutan (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- AdilBaguirov (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Atabek (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Dacy69 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Grandmaster (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Elsanaturk (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: E
Recently on 19 June 2007 there was an edit warring on Church of Kish page [1]. after all users spent their revert limits, and some even broke it, there appeared an IP and just-a-new account which continued reverting. for example, User:VartanM did four reverts [2], [3], [4], [5] and User:Hetoum I did three reverts [6][7][8], and then there appeared TheTruth4578 (talk · contribs) and IP 202.41.187.247 to do new reverts. Ateshi-Baghavan 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Lets check everybody shall we? VartanM 23:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- With great pleasure Vartanm, except, by including my name again don't forget this [9]. Thanks. Atabek 00:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sure its not you Atabek, but since I'm being checked why not check everybody? hopefully after this we could have a sock free enviroment. VartanM 02:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- LOL Atabek, you boast so proudly that Vartan was wrong about you before. Perhaps we should remind you of a certain user called Tengri. - Fedayee 23:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- You have been repeating that for 6 months, and have been through one ArbCom already. That issue was settled and clarifications have been made. Assume good faith. Atabek 23:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- LOL Atabek, you boast so proudly that Vartan was wrong about you before. Perhaps we should remind you of a certain user called Tengri. - Fedayee 23:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sure its not you Atabek, but since I'm being checked why not check everybody? hopefully after this we could have a sock free enviroment. VartanM 02:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- With great pleasure Vartanm, except, by including my name again don't forget this [9]. Thanks. Atabek 00:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Clerk note: commentd from the accused moved to talk page. --ST47Talk 23:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
Unrelated. Second batch not checked. Voice-of-All 20:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.