Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VartanM

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/VartanM}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] VartanM

Recently on 19 June 2007 there was an edit warring on Church of Kish page [1]. after all users spent their revert limits, and some even broke it, there appeared an IP and just-a-new account which continued reverting. for example, User:VartanM did four reverts [2], [3], [4], [5] and User:Hetoum I did three reverts [6][7][8], and then there appeared TheTruth4578 (talk · contribs) and IP 202.41.187.247 to do new reverts. Ateshi-Baghavan 21:56, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Lets check everybody shall we? VartanM 23:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
With great pleasure Vartanm, except, by including my name again don't forget this [9]. Thanks. Atabek 00:34, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
I'm sure its not you Atabek, but since I'm being checked why not check everybody? hopefully after this we could have a sock free enviroment. VartanM 02:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
LOL Atabek, you boast so proudly that Vartan was wrong about you before. Perhaps we should remind you of a certain user called Tengri. - Fedayee 23:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
You have been repeating that for 6 months, and have been through one ArbCom already. That issue was settled and clarifications have been made. Assume good faith. Atabek 23:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: commentd from the accused moved to talk page. --ST47Talk 23:21, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Unrelated. Second batch not checked. Voice-of-All 20:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.