Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tyar
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Tyar
main edit links history watch Filed: 19:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC) |
- Tyar (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Dbzwig (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Shinobigai (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- JMickle (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) — appears to be a single purpose account but likely a sock
- Anythingspossibleforapossible (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Saiyahog84 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Shortpier (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) — appears to be a single purpose account but likely a sock
- Demon Lord Naraku (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) — appears to be a single purpose account but likely a sock
- The Real Mr Snrub (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) — appears to be a single purpose account but likely a sock
- Ken shoryuken (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Wrestlinglover420 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Sasuke9031 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: A, B, C, E
All of these users have participated in either vandalising the same pages, similar edit warring styles, disruptive editing and/or complaining on the removal of unsourced content in many Dragon Ball-related pages, specifically on Talk:Dragon Ball Z and Talk:No. 18, as well the ongoing warring at articles such as Saiyan Saga, Freeza Saga, Cell Saga and Majin Buu Saga. I would like to know who is behind the "sock attack" and if Tyar or someone else here is either: evading their block or ban, abusing usernames or ips, and anything else they may have in common. Inclusively, I'd like for CheckUser to see if I missed anyone else. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:22, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
- The users are quite obviously unrelated. This can be seen from WHOISing the IPs. They resolve to quite a few different states- North Carolina, Ohio, Colorado, Rhode Island, and more. One of them is even a dynamic ADSL IP from London. Checking these accounts is unlikely to show up sleepers. If you want to attempt to link a particular puppeteer to some of these socks, please provide diffs and commentary showing similar behaviour patterns, and consider splitting this up into multiple cases. --Deskana (talk) 17:37, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- See http://tools.wikimedia.org/~eagle/socks/Tyar.1.html which contains a comparison of edits. I'm not going to dig through that, but if the requester wishes to use it to establish his claim, feel free. —— Eagle101Need help? 21:46, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- I'm suspecting that this is the same person using multiple internet accessed computers, hence, the different ips. What sort of gives him away is his editing style if you notice it carefully. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:03, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
- See http://tools.wikimedia.org/~eagle/socks/Tyar.1.html which contains a comparison of edits. I'm not going to dig through that, but if the requester wishes to use it to establish his claim, feel free. —— Eagle101Need help? 21:46, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
List of users who either reverted the Dragon Ball Z page to the same cruft revision or vandalized in similar-editing styles:
Dbzwig - [1]
Saiyahog84 - [2]
Anythingspossibleforapossible - [3]
List of users who attacked me and/or DBZROCKS during the Dragon Ball Z "cruft war" in similar-editing styles:
24.167.169.163 - [6]
24.250.25.233 - [7]
71.103.162.176 - [8]
List of similar-editing style users who accuse me and DBZROCKS of being sockpuppets:
Shinobigai - [11]
209.115.50.14 - [12]
List of very similarly-looking replies:
Wrestlinglover420 - [13]
Sasuke9031 - [14]
- Unrelated to Tyar. No comment on IPs. These are just vandal accounts. No checkuser intervention required. --Deskana (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.