Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Tecmobowl

[edit] Tecmobowl aka Jmfangio

• Tecmobowl (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Mrdrip (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: F
• Supporting evidence:

Several months back, Jmfangio (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) was blocked as a sock puppet of the banned Techmobowl. Mrdrip showed up today and instantly started warring with Chrisjnelson (talk · contribs) over NFL Pro Bowl naming conventions. This was a key element of the dispute that was the subject of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Jmfangio-Chrisjnelson. --B (talk) 17:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• Note: I blocked Mrdrip as a sockpuppet of Tecmobowl (talk · contribs). I just came across the RFCU after seeing the user's talk page. Nishkid64 (talk) 23:18, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Does this mean the checkuser has been done or is the block based on edit patterns? --B (talk) 01:04, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
    • The CheckUser has not been done. I based the block solely on the editing pattern. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:10, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
      • Hmm ... I'd say it's about 75% that it's him, 20% that it's a reincarnation of someone else and 5% that it's a real new user. But I hope, in the off chance that 5% is right, we haven't succeeded in biting a newbie. --B (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

The old guys are stale. Can you find the first CU operator and see if they saved the stats onto a hard drive? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:29, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: I have asked Morven if he has the old data from the Jmfangio-Tecmobowl CheckUser analysis he ran a few months back. Nishkid64 (talk) 02:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

This is probably moot as it's been 11 days since the account has been indefblocked and he hasn't protested his innocence. But can someone record Mrdrip's data so that if/when he makes another sock, we can have something to check it against? --B (talk) 14:44, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

It'll be in the checkuser logs from here now, and should be discoverable later. I think we can go for close on this one now - Alison ^❤ 14:55, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: Morven replied to my note on his talk page. He states that he could not find any records of the Tecmobowl CU request. Nishkid64 (talk) 07:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Has anyone asked Jpgordon? He made the first likely sock determination that largely contributed to Tecmobowl being community-banned in the first place. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:34, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Clerk note: [1] Jpgordon says he does not have any notes on the CU request. Nishkid64 (talk) 21:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tecmobowl

• Tecmobowl (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• El redactor (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: F

As described in this report on WP:ANI, Tecmobowl may have employed El redactor as an abusive sockpuppet to reinsert a link to his own website into an article while he was blocked. John254 07:29, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: moving a discussion where user:El redactor denies being a sockpuppet to the talk page. Please keep the discussion there. -- lucasbfr ^talk 16:26, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Unrelated. Voice-of-All 05:01, 14 June 2007 (UTC)