Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Suciindia

[edit] Suciindia

• Master: Suciindia (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• puppet 1: Sekharlk (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• puppet 2: Unitysuci (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Code Letter: E

Obvious sock creation to evade 3rr after the user has been warned of it [1] For this purpose only (talk) 17:30, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment; as per now, neither of the accounts have been used to break the 3RR on the SUCI article, rather they have added info to the last version of Suciindia. Sekharlk was created in November 2007. --Soman (talk) 17:58, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Soman is too involved a party for the above comment to be neutral. He has been edit warring the article for some time without discussing. This, despite suggestions made on his talk page [2]. Now, this attempted mitigation of obscene sockpuppetry by sticking to clumsy technicality is very tell-tale indeed. The moment the guy was warned he took to puppetry. And this experienced user is lawyering for this foul deed! 59.91.253.11 (talk) 18:59, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

People in glass houses... (aren't you User:Kuntan?) --Soman (talk) 19:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

• You can't be in doubt Soman. It is there on your talk page. I knew you would rely on that, for, you can't adduce a reasonable argument in favour of your cant promotion. 59.91.253.187 (talk) 12:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

• As Mr. Soman has rightly pointed out it is User:Kuntan who is back. Any way, we would like to make it very clear that we have our comrades assigned to handle Wikipedia content and for sure they will see to it that it does not miss represent the party ideology. The list of mass movements included are from a third party source as Wiki needs. And our party stands are described as ours and can only be refered to our own material. Any way User:59.91.253.11 must restrict himself from doing a mess in the document. The list of state committee publications can also be found in the wiki page of other parties too. As it is now in the page, it will be maintained, unless you have something to add to it.--Unitysuci (talk) 08:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

"And our party stands are described as ours and can only be refered to our own material." Soman, you are reading this? 59.91.253.187 (talk) 12:22, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Responding to a note left on my talkpage. Right, if there's an organised effort by party cadre to affect their entry, that's not good at all. People should keep a careful eye on sourcing and NPOV issues. Note however, that self-published sources are permissible for a bare description of party ideology and policy, though even there independent secondary sources, if available, are preferred. Relata refero (talk) 11:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree that there is an obvious WP:COI problem here, but this is a request for check on basis on sockpuppetering. In this case, it should be noted that User:Suciindia claims to be a collective account, managed by the party centre. I have asked on the user talkpage that Suciindia instead forms individual user accounts, to comply with wiki standards. --Soman (talk) 13:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Confirmed Thatcher 03:11, 29 March 2008 (UTC)