Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SirShiek

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SirShiek}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] SirShiek

main edit links history watch
Filed: 01:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

This Wikipedia:Single-purpose account appears to be a case of sockpuppetry used for Voting and other shows of support, for a particular fansite. see WT:WPSPAM case. I have banned the individal for re adding the spam link under this account, however if the check user turns up not to be related i would like to unban. related discussions. Geocities link flagged as spam, Fight for the Fansite!, Geocities link, Possible compromise on external links Hu12 01:22, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

SirShiek = 67.163.193.239 . WHOIS shows 84.217.169.79 and 84.217.16.202 geographically related at least. Voice-of-All 04:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

I'm afraid you are mistaken. I never wanted to get involved with this, but now I have no choice. I'm the owner of the infamous Rule of Rose fansite all the fighting has been over. Let me clarify that, whether you believe me or not, this is the first time I have posted on Wikipedia EVER. I am also the owner of a forum that has quite a good deal of the Rule of Rose fans out there on it, some of which have been participating in the fight-and no, not through any message on my forum telling them to do so-such a thing never existed. On my forum, I have the power to see the IPs of those who posts and am close friends with many of my members. I can tell you without a doubt that most of these IPs do not all belong to the same person, with the exception of the 84 one. Due to privacy reasons, I will not list who said members are. I am good friends with the person who owns the 67 IP you are accusing of being SirShiek now and have recently become accquainted with SirShiek himself since he just joined my forum after you banned him. They are not the same person, whether you choose to believe it or not. I can see both their IPs-they are NOT the same person.RedRosePrincess 06:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed. SirShiek = RedRosePrincess = 67.163.193.239. Voice-of-All 17:36, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for your time in this matter, V.O.A. --Hu12 17:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.