Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SimpsonsFan08
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] SimpsonsFan08
| main edit links history watch Filed: 23:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC) |
- SimpsonsFan08 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- SimpsonsFan2008 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- MrWP (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- SimsFan (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Doughnuts...Mmm! (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- King Monty IV (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Connorjack (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: F
- Supporting evidence: See One, Two, and Three. I'm submitting this following a discussion with Rlevse about the continuous flow of sockpuppets. I'm requesting that a rangeblock be applied to include the underlying IPs, assuming the collateral damage is minimal. The reason I believe checkuser is justified in this case is because there is no end in sight to the abusive sockpuppeteering. Every time a sockpuppet is outed by User:EJF or myself (and then blocked), another one appears. Enigma message 23:19, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Clerk note: I endorse this request. As soon as his socks are blocked, he makes new ones. Pls block underlying IPs too. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:37, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Confirmed these are the same user. Also Grandoldman (talk · contribs). The range is too big and dynamic to block. Thatcher 03:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- So we're stuck, basically. Unfortunate, because the socks keep flying in. Enigma message 04:31, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
- I added King Monty IV and Connorjack to the list at the top. Not that it matters much, though. As of now, Grandoldman is the only one of the accounts that's not blocked. Enigma message 04:35, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
