Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shinedrc

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shinedrc}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] Shinedrc

  • Code letter: G

For over a week now I've been trying to clean up the DVD ripper article (which was tagged accordingly) by making it a general article (well, stub), adding links to specific applications and moving the details to their respective articles (see also the talk page for an explanation). Other(s) have simply reverted those edits without keeping the added links, thus promoting one specific application, whilst obscuring others. No attempts are made to clean up the article, which is a shamble, and any edits other than reverts are not in keeping with Wikipedia standards. Barely any useful comments are left on the talk page and the two that are there are unsigned. I encounter such editors occasionally, but several at the same time at the same article doing the same thing seems like too much of a coincidence to me. Not sure about Gspong - that might actually indeed be a coincidence. DirkvdM 06:10, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

I concur that the patterns of edits suggest an unusual interest in the topic area of DVD ripping... therefore I did investigate further.
Results were Inconclusive with the following subresults:
  • Possible Missjordan, Bryantsinger
  • Unlikely Gspong to anyone else listed
  • Unlikely Shinedrc to anyone else listed
I suggest monitoring behaviour and blocking based on that. ++Lar: t/c 22:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.