Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shakim67

[edit] IntheGhetto06

• IntheGhetto06 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Shakim67 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• 69.137.209.216 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)
• 68.171.52.234 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip)

User appears to be another abusive sockpuppet of a user blocked for personal attacks, using multiple sockpuppets, etc., and seems to be continuing the abuse. See for example [1]. Yamla 18:52, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Added checkip. User has so far created three sockpuppets that we have caught so if this user is once again using abusive sockpuppets, it would be nice to place a block on the IP address as well. --Yamla 20:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

• Additionally, please note within minutes of answering a Helpme for the the IP here, where I warned the IP of my suspicions of block evasion, User:IntheGhetto06 account was created. The second thing the user did after putting in a help me for the autoblock was to request unblock, giving the same IP as the user I had just warned. Here the user admits to that being his IP, but now claims that he shares it with his friend whose little brother had maybe done something, but left for six months. Additionally, the user made a personal attack against User:JD UK regarding sexual preference, the exact same attack made by the blocked users. The user has also copy-and-pasted his userpage from the pages of the blocked accounts. Teke 02:19, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• I'm adding another IP because of something that was said to me by one of them, and events occurring shortly afterwards that may be directly linked to it. --JD ^{don't talk} _{email me} 10:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Here's a nice diff [2]. I think we can trust her. Ryūlóng 02:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Here's another [3]. Teke 07:19, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

The following are other accounts that have been proven to be related to this user

• Can't Nobody Step To Me (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Chrisbrownwifey06 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• CertifiedGangsta (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

Also note that the IP address left this message in my archives, more than likely due to the Wiki-essay I am working on, which means someone has gone through my contributions. Ryūlóng 21:21, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: I'm a bit confused. Who do you think is the main account/alleged puppetmaster? Thatcher131 (talk) 05:54, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• The alleged puppetmaster is Shakim67, and his prior RFCU is here: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Shakim67#Skakim67. Ryūlóng 06:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Thanks. Cases merged. Thatcher131 (talk) 06:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• No problem. Ryūlóng 06:11, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Confirmed I've noticed that the other confirmed sockpuppets are only blocked for a month, which seems odd to me. I'm reblocking them all indefinitely and treating Shakim67 as the main account. Mackensen (talk) 16:24, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shakim67

• Shakim67 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Can't Nobody Step To Me (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Chrisbrownwifey06 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• CertifiedGangsta (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Cute 1 4 u (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

All of these users had shown up in the past few days and all have nearly the same writing styles and ages, focuses on edit counting (and wishes to become admins based off of their edit counts), and all treat Wikipedia like MySpace. Specifically this message placed by Can't Nobody Step To Me (formerly shinemygrillz) on Cute 1 4 u's userpage which showed at least some block evasion/sockpuppetry. While I doubt that the sockpuppeteer would be posting messages on his own puppets pages, there's still some suspicion about the identities of these users (several claim to be related to each other, although they may just be using AAVE calling each other brother and sister). Ryūlóng 01:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: Can't Nobody Step To Me blocked for a week, Chrisbrownwifey06 for a month, Also, here are some interesting diffs[4][5]. Voice-of-All 22:54, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

• Yeah...I have no idea which accounts belong to who... There just seems to be some account-cest going on. Ryūlóng 23:26, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Confirmed except for Cute 1 4 u (talk · contribs), which is Unrelated. Kelly Martin (talk) 06:56, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• I had a feeling about that, however, Chrisbrownwifey06 identified as a girl, while the other accounts were guys. And I do not know if they are actually separate people who are all just on the same connection/computer. Still, I don't think the English Wikipedia would be losing anything if they were all indefblocked (that and the semi-racist remark made by one of them, and the personal attacks by the unrelated user on other users would be greater reasons to have them go to MySpace or livejournal where they can be a part of a community). --Ryūlóng 07:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Bah. Block all of the related accounts indefinitely. They're sharing all of them. Can't Nobody Step To Me (may have been Shakim67) used a {{helpme}} on User talk:Chrisbrownwifey06 and Shakim67 has been using the other accounts to try and get the password for Can't Nobody Step To Me's account to try and evade his second block. Wikipedia will not lose anything if this "family" cannot edit. Ryūlóng 00:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)