Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/SevenOfDiamonds

[edit] SevenOfDiamonds

• SevenOfDiamonds (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• SixOfDiamonds (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser) - this is certain, he's admitted it and as such, we have no problem with switching accounts
• Rootology (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Fairness And Accuracy For All (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: F or B - Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic

I think this is an obvious, disruptive sock puppet, which should result in a block. No checkuser is necessary. But, I don't want to be the one to make the block, since I've worked with MONGO quite a bit on some articles, may not be seen as a neutral admin. The user has been trolling and following User:MONGO around. SevenOfDiamonds arrived here as User:SixOfDiamonds, but "lost his password" and became User:SevenOfDiamonds. That's not a problem, but these accounts are fairly obvious sockpuppets of banned User:Fairness And Accuracy For All or User:Rootology. The user's first edit was to an AFD, with knowledge of policy [1] and second edit (also to the AFD) to say he is "not a single purpose account". [2] The disruption by this obvious sockpuppet needs to stop. --Aude (talk) 08:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: moved discussion to talk. This includes several comments from the accused. A previous case involving SixOfDiamonds is here. Kwsn^(Ni!) 19:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

And another pending here --SevenOfDiamonds 19:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Declined. Rootology and FAAFA are stale. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 20:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)