Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Saikano

[edit] Saikano

• Saikano (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Mr.Taka (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: F

Saikano has already had several sock puppets blocked (User:Akemi2.0 and User:AkemiX). Both were blocked basically through the duck test, because they were obvious. User:Mr.Taka was created the day Akemi2.0 was blocked, and shares the same obsession of anime, interest in weather phenomena, and abusive edit habits. He hasn't yet done anything agregiously disruptive with Mr.Taka yet, but all of the warning signs are there (disrupting user talk pages and admins). Leebo ^T/C 17:43, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, see User talk:Mr.Taka#Vandalism on Talk:Lightning for the recent disruption. Leebo ^T/C 17:49, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry to keep adding things in pieces, but I wanted to note the differences between Mr.Taka and the accounts in quesion:

• Mr.Taka does not appear to be a reference to the anime Saikano, as the other were.
• Mr.Taka has not made any mention of lolicon or pedophilia, as the other accounts did.

I feel these differences warrant the checkuser over the duck test. Leebo ^T/C 18:06, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 18:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Saikano

• Saikano (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Akemi2.0 (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• Code letter: F

7 March, 12:23PM: I block Saikano for being completely unhelpful and disrupting this website for over three months. (Relevant discussion is on his talk page.)

7 March, 12:43PM: A new account is created that acts exactly the same as Saikano and edits the same pages. If we took the same don't-bite-the-newbies stance this will take a month to block him again.

Confirmation requested. Shii (tock) formerly Ashibaka 16:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Unnecessary. Duck test. --jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 21:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)