Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Real96

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Real96}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] Real96

main edit links history watch
Filed: 20:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: C

Was being watched by several administrators's for violations such as trolling [1] , harrassment [2] and harrassment [3] . [4] Claimed harrasment that he/she was being stalked by an admin (KillerChihuahua) [5]. She was caught harrassing other wiki members. [6]. An RFC was about to take place [7] , BUT, in an attempt to circumvent the RFC Bearly541 retired. Which is alright. There was no clear connection to Real96 until Real96 corrected the userpage for bearly541. [8]. Bearly541 put a lot of work into The Links, Incorporated as Real96 works on it as well. [9]. Real96 became more of a user when Bearly541 started was "retired." If an RFC was bout to be filed, and a user retired and starts to use another account. Then that is not acting within good faith. SuperStroke 20:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Corrects users on wrong article references. [10] and [11], removes edits without checking references or factuality [12] and states that there is vandalism when there isn't. [13] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SuperStroke (talk • contribs) 23:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC).
Neither C nor F apply. Bearly541 isn't community banned, or she would have an entry in her block log. And I see no vandalism by Real96. Please come back with a reason for checkuser. Picaroon 22:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
corrected F removed, and more evidence for C was inserted. SuperStroke 23:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Declined. Essjay (Talk) 01:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.