Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Poyoyloar

[edit] Poyoyloar

• Poyoyloar (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Tromatical (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Fearedhallmonitor (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

SECOND SET:

• ArchieHall (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• MikeWatt (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
• Dwaltzwriter (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)

• D, E, G:

• Supporting evidence: Poyoyloar-related:
  • [1] [2] vs. [3] [4]
  • [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] vs. [13]

• ArchieHall-related:
  • [14]
  • [15]
  • [16]

This is a rather complex case. There are two SSP reports involved here: Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Poyoyloar and Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/ArchieHall. I think there is sock/meating going on in both cases, but it's hard to tell if all six named parties are guilty, but I'm sure a few are. Rather than repeat the massive detail available in the SSPs, please refer to them for more information. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:30, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

• Confirmed Poyoyloar, Tromatical, Fearedhallmonitor, and also SgtKabukiman (talk · contribs).
• Confirmed MikeWatt and ArchieHall.
• Dwaltzwriter is Unrelated. Thatcher 10:59, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Clerk note: All four socks blocked indef, masters one week. Tagged all. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:50, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

• • Wait, let me get this right. So this post on my talk page by ArchieHall where he/she complains about Poyoyloar was all just a scam? That's it. That's the second time I've been jerked around by lying socks like this. I quit now. EconomicsGuy (talk) 13:13, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

ArchieHall and Poyoyloar are two different people, but both are puppeteers. — Rlevse • Talk • 13:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

• Rlevse is correct, there are two different groups of sockpuppets that are unrelated to each other. Thatcher 13:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)