Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Peroxisome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Peroxisome}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Peroxisome

main edit links history watch
Filed: 16:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter: F

Peroxisome (talk · contribs) was recently blocked indefinitely for trolling. Shortly thereafter, WP User 29 (talk · contribs) appeared at the community sanction noticeboard to repeat many of Peroxisome's arguments and to agitate against a ban on one of his allies. I believe that WP User 29 is likely a sockpuppet of Peroxisome being used to evade his block. MastCell Talk 16:50, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Adding ClearCase Guy (talk · contribs) - second edit was to jump into the WP:CSN discussion from Peroxisome's POV, and third edit was to defend Peroxisome on Peroxisome's talk page. MastCell Talk 18:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
I concur with this request. I hope that someone will check this out, and put it to rest. Like most of MastCell's very prolific accusations against his fellow editors, I'm sure there is nothing to it. Peroxisome, ClearCase Guy, WP User 29, myself, and a few other editors don't happen to share MastCell's POV that the Steven Milloy article should be overwhelmingly critical of Mr. Milloy, instead of balanced with evenhanded treatment of criticism and praise. That doesn't make us ogres. NCdave 22:49, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Unrelated, geographically. --Deskana (apples) 22:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.