Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pejman47

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pejman47}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

[edit] Pejman47 (2nd)

  • Code letter:F

There are two Articles Māzandarān Province and Sari, Iran, which this user is involved in, i welcomed him to discuss, but he continuously insists on entering nonsenses to the article, and he don't come compromise, as he never answered my questions in the article's appropriate talk page, and he refers to others, Others are actually this user, Please see the block log, and also see the history of the article Māzandarān Province where those accunts are there and the user is using them in the way of bypassing the rules of WP.
behmod reverted [1] for Pejman [2], and then credited his revert as "other users do not agree with it" when pejman47 is his username. Pejman also reverted it again. Ali 09:39, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Another evidence is in Mazandarani people page, User Pejman47 proposed deletion of [3], when the most were agree KhoiKhoi deleted it, Also User:Azerbaijani tagged two comments of User:Atashparast for reference [4], Which then user Behmod deleted them [5], See Also [6] --Ali 09:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
User:ChateauLincoln registered to acting like "Good hand, bad hand" stated Here --Ali 10:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Pejman and Behmod have same behaviour, And also they involve at same articles [7], the form of their english is similar either --Ali 11:58, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
I added another user whose edit pattern is similar to Pejman47 (i.e. his contribs are mostly rvs on controversial articles with little or no discussion). Grandmaster 13:22, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
Behmod deleted and removed his username from here [8], I readded it again. --Ali 05:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed. Behmod = ChateauLincoln. AlexanderPar on an open proxy. Others not related. Voice-of-All 03:27, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Clerk note: Copied from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Pejman47 (2nd). --Michael Billington (talk) 01:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pejman47

Quite strange, the page Azerbaijan is unblocked and Azerbaijani disappeared all of a sudden, replaced by Pejman47 who is involved in the same vandalist activity on this page.Atabek 22:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Additional information needed The instructions for Code E say, List here with links to four diffs showing the 3RR violation. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I actually requested the users to be checked as sockpups of each other. But I will put that request on Sockpuppet reporting page as well. Here are the rvs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan&oldid=104449468 (rv by Azerbaijani)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan&oldid=104432015 (rv by Pejman47)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan&oldid=104429274 (rv by Pejman47)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan&oldid=104423072 (rv by Mardavich)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan&oldid=104354950 (rv by Pejman47)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Azerbaijan&oldid=104344829 (rv by Mardavich)

No contribution, just rv'ing, and so please check the users for being sockpups of each other (which I very much suspect). Kind thanks. Atabek 00:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Declined. Both sides in this particular content dispute are attempting to use RFCU to score points against each other; any further requests from anyone in this dispute will be rejected without consideration. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 03:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made
above, in a new section.