Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/OleFairhoper

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/OleFairhoper}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] OleFairhoper

main edit links history watch
Filed: 14:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Code letter:G

This request centers around edits to Fairhope, Alabama. User:OleFairhoper has added unsourced, POV material into the article and refuses to discuss on the discussion page. Alone, that would simply be edit warring. However, User:OldFairhoper (note the slight spelling difference) has engaged in making the same edits. Now, User:Twizzlesticks and User:207.157.85.3 are doing the same.

Recent diffs for User:OleFairhoper [1], [2], [3],

Recent diffs for User:Twizzlesticks [4], [5], [6],

Recent diff for User:207.157.85.3 [7], [8]

Recent diffs for User:OldFairhoper [9], [10], please notice here he finishes the edit from User:Twizzlesticks, [11],

I believe this substantiates the claim of sockpuppetry although I cannot be sure who's the sock and who's the puppet but all of these have single focused goal not likely in four different users. JodyB yak, yak, yak 14:32, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Confirmed with respect to the user accounts; no comment on the IP. Mackensen (talk) 18:58, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

12.214.59.130 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • block user • block log • checkip) Is it possible that User:12.214.59.130, since that isn't directly related to the school, is also one of the persons in question above? --Mnemnoch 03:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.