Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Nkras
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Nkras
| main edit links history watch Filed: 09:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC) |
- Nkras (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Stonewall Revisited (talk • contribs • logs • block user • block log • checkuser)
- Code letter: F
Diff of ban. If this is Nkras, then he is attempting to sway an RFC, which appears problematic. The Stonewall account has made a comment about religious attacks,[1] which was the blip on the radar, similar to something Nkras often said.[2] This is not perfectly obvious, though, it could be someone else, thus the CU request. — coelacan — 09:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Question for clerk: there are many IPs in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Nkras which may be useful in identifying Stonewall. Should these IPs be listed, or would that be a waste of time for the person performing the checkuser? It's no problem for me to list, but I don't want to unnecessarily consume someone's time. — coelacan — 09:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tricky question. Of the 35 IPs currently in the category, most appear to come from dynamic ranges, and while I can't speak for any logged in edits which may or may not have been made, I count 8 that have any anon edits inside what I understand to be the period CU records may be available -- and all of them are right about on the edge of that period, at that. Listing here in order of having edited, just in case:
- From there, I guess we can let the CUs decide how much checking can or needs to be done. – Luna Santin (talk) 02:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Tricky question. Of the 35 IPs currently in the category, most appear to come from dynamic ranges, and while I can't speak for any logged in edits which may or may not have been made, I count 8 that have any anon edits inside what I understand to be the period CU records may be available -- and all of them are right about on the edge of that period, at that. Listing here in order of having edited, just in case:
Inconclusive The Uninvited Co., Inc. 20:25, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you, UninvitedCompany. Does that mean the timespan was too long to get IP data, or the IPs were in a similar range but not one of those specific IPs, or something else? — coelacan — 22:13, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- I can't comment in detail. I compared the two users specified in the check and the technical evidence was inconclusive. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 02:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.
