Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Miracleimpulse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Miracleimpulse}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.


[edit] Miracleimpulse

view edit history watch
Filed: 16:23, December 22, 2006 (UTC)

  • Code letter: N/A

There is a requested sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/miracleimpulse, but I think there is enough circumstantial evidence to clear some of these suspected sockpuppets and I've offered on behalf of User:Meisterchef to open a checkuser request to clear him as he is currently blocked as a sockpuppet of User:Miracleimpulse. User:meisterchef has stated on his talk page that 68.60.17.31 is his IP and User:Eyetomhas is an earlier account he'd registered (and as there is no concurrent editing here I don't see this as a WP:SOCK violation). User:Miracleimpulse edits from IP 24.12.179.210. Basically I'd like a checkuser on the alleged puppetmaster User:Miracleimpulse. If User:Miracleimpulse has never edited from 68.60.17.31 or any IP in that range (and User:Meisterchef has no edits from 24.12.179.210), then I think it would be safe to say User:Meisterchef is not him and he should probably be unblocked as an indef based on one edit in support of User:Miracleimpulse's position is overkill unless there is strong checkuser evidence he is a sock.--Isotope23 16:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Clerk note: Moved the above request from Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Pending and tidied it up a bit. Wasn't sure which code letter to apply; if DB could have a look (or will ask requesting editor). Luna Santin 16:23, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
I wasn't sure which code to use either, so I left it blank. I'm requesting this on behalf of someone on indef block, essentially because they swear they are not a sockpuppet and based on a couple of tells I'm inclined to believe he is telling the truth.--Isotope23 16:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
N/A sounds good. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 22:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Unrelated. I see no signs of any kind of sockpuppetry here. Essjay (Talk) 01:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.